<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Culture, Context, and Composition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org</link>
	<description>Class blog and wiki for CCC</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Malcolm X and James Farmer</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/11/19/malcolm-x-and-james-farmer/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/11/19/malcolm-x-and-james-farmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/11/19/malcolm-x-and-james-farmer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<object	type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
			data="http://youtube.com/v/8ISDcGAQmgw"
			width="425"
			height="350">
	<param name="movie" value="http://youtube.com/v/8ISDcGAQmgw" />
	<param name=wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code>
<object	type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
			data="http://youtube.com/v/8ISDcGAQmgw"
			width="425"
			height="350">
	<param name="movie" value="http://youtube.com/v/8ISDcGAQmgw" />
	<param name=wmode" value="transparent" />
</object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/11/19/malcolm-x-and-james-farmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Info on feeds</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/25/info-on-feeds/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/25/info-on-feeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sallen.umwblogs.org/2007/09/25/info-on-feeds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check this out for info on how feeds work. This will help you better understand &#8212; if you don&#8217;t already &#8212; how Anderson is conceptualizing the &#8220;feed&#8221; in Feed.  
http://edtech.tennessee.edu/~set31/02_08.htm
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out for info on how feeds work. This will help you better understand &#8212; if you don&#8217;t already &#8212; how Anderson is conceptualizing the &#8220;feed&#8221; in <em>Feed</em>. <img src='http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://edtech.tennessee.edu/~set31/02_08.htm">http://edtech.tennessee.edu/~set31/02_08.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/25/info-on-feeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question 3</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-3/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sallen.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What values, what distinctions, what assumptions are at work in these truths? IOW, reflect on what constitutes (what beliefs, what &#8220;ideologies,&#8221; make up) the specific society that practices these meanings (of black and white) as if they are givens?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What values, what distinctions, what assumptions are at work in these truths? IOW, reflect on what constitutes (what beliefs, what &#8220;ideologies,&#8221; make up) the specific society that practices these meanings (of black and white) as if they are givens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question 2</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sallen.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can we read those ‘truths’ not simply as givens, as obvious and natural, but as meanings that are produced “in a specific society” and according to “the ways in which that society talks and thinks about itself and its experience”?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we read those ‘truths’ not simply as givens, as obvious and natural, but as meanings that are <em>produced</em> “in a specific society” and according to “the ways in which that society talks and thinks about itself and its experience”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question 1</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sallen.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the “obvious” and “natural” beliefs or associations (i.e. so-called truths) at work in the definitions of “black” and “white” read by Malcolm X in the scene we watched?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the “obvious” and “natural” beliefs or associations (i.e. so-called truths) at work in the definitions of “black” and “white” read by Malcolm X in the scene we watched?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote for Questions 1-3</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sallen.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a quote from Belsey: &#8220;[...I]t is argued that what seems obvious and natural is not necessarily so, but that on the contrary the &#8216;obvious&#8217; and the &#8216;natural&#8217; are not given  but produced in a specific society by the ways in which that society talks and thinks about itself and its experience&#8221; (3).
To answer the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quote from Belsey: &#8220;[...I]t is argued that what seems obvious and natural is not necessarily so, but that on the contrary the &#8216;obvious&#8217; and the &#8216;natural&#8217; are not <em>given</em>  but <em>produced</em> in a specific society by the ways in which that society talks and thinks about itself and its experience&#8221; (3).</p>
<p>To answer the next few questions, you should first consider the difference between &#8220;given&#8221; and &#8220;produced.&#8221; What do you think these mean &#8212; in relation to each other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/13/question-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belsey</title>
		<link>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/05/welcome-to-the-ccc-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/05/welcome-to-the-ccc-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sallen</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sallen.umwblogs.org/2007/09/05/welcome-to-the-ccc-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Trust me that this is the most accessible intro to structuralist and poststructuralist theory available. Saussure was a structuralist, and most of the big names in continental philosophy since him are poststructuralists (Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze,  etc, etc). She&#8217;s basically introducing you to the lit theory and philosophy that has been championed for the last few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="1"></p>
<p align="left">Trust me that this is the most accessible intro to structuralist and poststructuralist theory available. Saussure was a structuralist, and most of the big names in continental philosophy since him are poststructuralists (Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze,  etc, etc). She&#8217;s basically introducing you to the lit theory and philosophy that has been championed for the last few decades (here in the US, anyway. Europe caught on much faster), and she&#8217;s showing you how that lit theory/philosophy is a fundamental critique of the transparent relationship between individuals, language, and meaning (i.e. &#8220;common sense realism&#8221;).</p>
<p align="left">More specifically, in these theories, individuals don&#8217;t &#8220;create&#8221; meaning. Language designates meaning. Thus meaning exists through a complex of relations and exchanges. Individuals then participate in the use of language and, as such, participate in/perpetuate structures of meaning already at work (per structuralism). In other words, society tells you how to use language. You have to &#8212; even in the most subversive prose &#8212; adhere to certain rules of language (that exist before you did).</p>
<p align="left">As for the poststructuralists, we could spend the next 6 years talking about that work and only scrape the surface. But generally, one of the major tenets of that line of philosophy is that we (individuals) are actually *constructed by* language. We are subjects because we are subjected by language (or discourse&#8230; thank you, Foucault).</p>
<p align="left">Just do your best.</p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultureandcontext.umwblogs.org/2007/09/05/welcome-to-the-ccc-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
